🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or deny as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would determine the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with possible prison sentences for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Previous administrations had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement extensive additional powers, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental assaults on freedom have effectively abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Justify Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by referring to last week's heinous anti-Jewish assault on a British mosque. There should be universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at genocide, you likely can't establish limits at democracy," observed a prominent American author, whose words that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their era, even while they were fighting for the rights of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In today's complex situation, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

Western popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens think Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the state, and approve the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be involved in this effort. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately challenged for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where law enforcement can suggest that protests opposing Israel's actions should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have stated that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "complicit" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from 24 months of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous boundary by proscribing Palestine Action, a peaceful, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, mostly for carrying placards against genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, endured hardship and died to secure our liberties. We may ultimately rue how casually we allowed them to slip away.