🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since those days, focusing less on the histories of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and greater focus on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month better than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A effort to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a professor at an educational institution, put it best when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) included in educational programs. It would also be a time that does not shy away from governmental matters, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.