🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to restart negotiations with the US government. He said Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is walking a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader declaring the sites had been destroyed. Afterward, European countries exercised their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iranian officials said the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in various formats if discussions restart.

The American leader last week stated he had been getting signals that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives claim they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the conference, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He said the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their demands during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the ultimate answer to address conflicts, but its standards, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the battle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He stated: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to destroy, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The Iranian people have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more backing of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."