🔗 Share this article

This film boasts a talented cast, depicting the real-life tale of coach Ingle, who guided a brash Sheffield teenager from Yemeni immigrant parents. Known as “Prince” Naseem Hamed, the fighter was taught to confront prejudice and transformed into a media-friendly titleholder in the 1990s. Ingle nurtured his flamboyant confidence and lethal fists, but after achieving wealth, the boxer turned against his mentor, excluding him and turning him into a mix of John Falstaff and Broadway Danny Rose.

Performers and Roles

Brosnan plays the trainer; Amir El-Masry embodies the part of the prince, and Toby Stephens appears as the assertive London promoter Warren, who recognized the potential that the coach had discovered.

Where the Movie Falls Short

Yet, the film honestly lacks the fighter’s agility: the boxing sequences flow well, but the crucial drama between them is consistently flat and monotonous. It lacks nuance or contrast in the depiction of the protagonist himself, and El-Masry, an otherwise excellent talent, isn’t given the chance to display any depth or much of what might make his character really interesting – although he’s obviously been working out and looks very plausible in the ring.

Dialogue and Music Issues

The drama is often lumbered with functional, expositional dialogue that inform you precisely what is going on and what we are meant to feel (“Your journey began your boxing journey at age seven …”). It is the sort of dialogue that streaming-TV producers call “double-screen”, making sure you understand what’s unfolding while you’re viewing the movie but also glancing at your phone. Additionally, the background music is overbearing, sometimes nearly overwhelming, particularly in the moment where the boxer gets overexcited visiting Warren in his palatial residence.

Performances and Key Moments

Although El-Masry and Brosnan do their very best, their relationship never really comes to life, and the big set-piece fight scenes are frequently anticlimactically truncated. A key moment is certainly when, provoked beyond endurance in the training facility one day by Hamed as a delusional “old man”, the trainer in fact proposes to get in the ring and fight him. Everyone in the room is shocked and uneasy. How exactly is this insanely unwise standoff going to play out? What will be the ending? Certainly the champion is going to defeat him? Or will he sentimentally pull his punches? It’s not clear.

Highlights and Humor

That’s not to say that there are no some nice jabs. The actor elicits humor when his character tells a reporter what he’s teaching the kids from his neighborhood: to oppose bias and when you meet a offender, “Punch him in the bollocks”. It’s funny too when Hamed squirms at the ridiculous antics the coach makes him do in the beginning: posing as the “monster from the Middle East”.

Storyline and Final Thoughts

As for the falling out, the movie depicts this as being exacerbated by a revealing publication that Ingle is allegedly written (a story element clearly adapted from prior material), and there is an intriguingly conceived final conversation – although the emotional tribute that the boxer is reportedly paid to his mentor after his death is merely referenced in the closing credits, and not shown on film. There is engaging content in this film, but the punches fail to connect.

The film screened at the festival and is available in UK and Irish theaters from January 9.